Skip to main content Skip to footer

The Data Dialogue: Time to Share

Researchers are faced throughout their careers with managing research data. Implementing best practice early on can not only help you to access the right data quickly, but also ensure that data is relevant,  reusable and accessible to others, contributing further to scientific research.

The first part of The Data Dialogue – Time to Share: Navigating Boundaries and Benefits –  provided Early CareerResearchers from a range of disciplines with the tools and knowledge to better approach their research data needs, covering the benefits of sharing data, how we share difficult and sensitive data, gaining access to restricted, secure, or open data, and what types of repositories are available for use.

With case studies revealing tangible experience in accessing and managing data, our speakers shared their own discipline-specific examples and welcomed wonderful feedback for the day.

From our Researchers

“Contagious enthusiasm”

“More data sharing and open access – that’s great!”

“Variety of backgrounds and viewpoints”

Transparency in Social Science Research & Teaching, The University of CambridgeWatch full talk | Download presentationPersonal, not painful: practical and motivating experiences in data sharing, The UK Data ServiceWatch full talk | Download presentationIntermine: A Data Integration Model for Re-use of Biological Data, IntermineWatch full talk | Download presentationThe Processes and Benefits of Sharing Clinical Data, King’s College LondonWatch full talk | Download presentationUsing Linked Census-Servey Data to Monitor Survey Non-response, The University of SouthamptonWatch full talk | Download presentationChemical Science and Data Repository Design, Imperial College LondonWatch full talkAddressing the Problem of Human Genomic Data Discoverability, RepositiveWatch full talk | Download presentationBetter knowledge, better society: how ADRC-E can support your research and enhance its impact, ADRC-EWatch full talk | Download presentationEvidence for economic policy, The University of Cambridge